I see chaw is still but hurt becuase of the total beating Waterturd took from Trimble.
WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:41 pm
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Just watched the replay, still in shock, but what a great ball game this was to watch live and then again on replay. Hate it for our seniors but they have nothing to hang their heads about. Springfield is an excellent team
Its all in the hips
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:16 pm
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
I heard that Lucky Charms was calling the game for Springfield. Almost champs again.
Last edited by 3rd and one on Sun Nov 17, 2019 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
How come Trimble played in D6? Aren't you guys about the same as us here at Eastern in size?
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Trimble has three kids who live right on the line who have played at Trimble all there lives but this they they used the competitive balance to figure Trimbles division.
- Ground Buck
- All Conference
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 8:18 pm
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Hated to see the wee cats lose, but as I predicted they struggled in the passing game when forced to by a good team. One thing is for sure though, they learned that D6 is a lot tougher than D7. Still a great year and nothing to hang your heads about.
Disclaimer: This is all an opinion and I am therefore hoping we can still express opinions on this site without retort.
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
I know one D6 team that they didn't struggle with.Ground Buck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 12:10 pm Hated to see the wee cats lose, but as I predicted they struggled in the passing game when forced to by a good team. One thing is for sure though, they learned that D6 is a lot tougher than D7. Still a great year and nothing to hang your heads about.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 6:42 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Fed Hock!Superman wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:26 pmI know one D6 team that they didn't struggle with.Ground Buck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 12:10 pm Hated to see the wee cats lose, but as I predicted they struggled in the passing game when forced to by a good team. One thing is for sure though, they learned that D6 is a lot tougher than D7. Still a great year and nothing to hang your heads about.
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:41 pm
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
They attempted 4 passes all game and 2 were into the endzone as time was expiring basically you moron.Ground Buck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 12:10 pm Hated to see the wee cats lose, but as I predicted they struggled in the passing game when forced to by a good team. One thing is for sure though, they learned that D6 is a lot tougher than D7. Still a great year and nothing to hang your heads about.
Its all in the hips
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2015 7:01 am
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
they would have still been d6 if they didnt get a handful of kids fom fed hock. In a way they re the reason fed lost their program.
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
There players didnt come from fed hockerEd Turdwhittler wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:28 pmthey would have still been d6 if they didnt get a handful of kids fom fed hock. In a way they re the reason fed lost their program.
- Raider6309
- SEOPS HOF
- Posts: 12977
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
- Location: Athens
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
“As I predicted,” makes you sound like PaladinGround Buck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 12:10 pm Hated to see the wee cats lose, but as I predicted they struggled in the passing game when forced to by a good team. One thing is for sure though, they learned that D6 is a lot tougher than D7. Still a great year and nothing to hang your heads about.
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Paladin want to be lol how sad.Raider6309 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:46 pm“As I predicted,” makes you sound like PaladinGround Buck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 12:10 pm Hated to see the wee cats lose, but as I predicted they struggled in the passing game when forced to by a good team. One thing is for sure though, they learned that D6 is a lot tougher than D7. Still a great year and nothing to hang your heads about.
- Raider6309
- SEOPS HOF
- Posts: 12977
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
- Location: Athens
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Paladin is getting old, ground chuck might have to be the new Paladin
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Raider6309 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:54 pm Paladin is getting old, ground chuck might have to be the new Paladin
-
- JV Team
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 1:44 am
- Ground Buck
- All Conference
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 8:18 pm
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
WOW! What a compliment. To Paladine that is.Raider6309 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:54 pm Paladin is getting old, ground chuck might have to be the new Paladin
But really, these jokers on here stoned me when I said the wee cats would struggle to pass against a good team. Then, after two picks in the end zone cost them the game, they try to change the subject. Just pointing out that I knew what I was talking about. But hey, the bright side is in a year or two looks like they'll be back in D7 where they can run the wishbone with ineligible T's instead of TE's as their EMOLOS all the way to the state finals.
Disclaimer: This is all an opinion and I am therefore hoping we can still express opinions on this site without retort.
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Finally came out of the hole i see ground suck you seem to be forgetting about the first play off game. Where was you and your stupidity then.Ground Buck wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 11:08 amWOW! What a compliment. To Paladine that is.Raider6309 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:54 pm Paladin is getting old, ground chuck might have to be the new Paladin
But really, these jokers on here stoned me when I said the wee cats would struggle to pass against a good team. Then, after two picks in the end zone cost them the game, they try to change the subject. Just pointing out that I knew what I was talking about. But hey, the bright side is in a year or two looks like they'll be back in D7 where they can run the wishbone with ineligible T's instead of TE's as their EMOLOS all the way to the state finals.
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
They came from Morgan .....................nice try...Ed Turdwhittler wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:28 pmthey would have still been d6 if they didnt get a handful of kids fom fed hock. In a way they re the reason fed lost their program.
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:41 pm
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
They've been at Trimble their whole lives so I wouldn't even say they came from Morgantomcat82 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 2:07 pmThey came from Morgan .....................nice try...Ed Turdwhittler wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:28 pmthey would have still been d6 if they didnt get a handful of kids fom fed hock. In a way they re the reason fed lost their program.
Its all in the hips