SoutheasternOhioPreps.com

So can Hiland give Waterford all they want, does Waterford have much of a bench, Fort Frye is very good defensive team,I knew something would have to give when Hiland scores 95 and 93 ,Fort Frye only gave up 14 and 19 in the tournament, I thought the winner would score around the Mid 40's

Cadets just could not make open shots. Cut it down to 6 in 3rd and then Schlabach(Coaches Daughter) went to town draining 4 3 pointers in a row. Wish Makayla Liedtke could of played.

Should be a good one Waterford defense about as good as Forts, and they have a deeper bench just like Hilands.

But....they must both keep winning. they would meet up at The Schot in state semi-final. Hope they both make it.

rickoshay wrote:Waterford defense about as good as Forts:

LOL

If and Big if we meet Highland, I think I would rather play them in the big arena. They are a 3 point shooting team, Id say that would benefit Waterford.

That could be the nicest thing you've ever said on here. Didnt say it particularly well, but at least you made an effort. There are classes that teach english as a second language to people who have a hard time , you should check into it.

Blackhawk wrote:H204rd the more I hear from you and other people you have got to be a meathead.

What is it with you Blackhawk? He's just giving his opinion. He's prolly biased to Waterford based on his name but whether he's right or wrong it's just an observation he's making based on his opinion of those 2 teams....... How does that make him a meat head? You got some serious issues man.

Hey thats all I was doing when he was cutting me down about Simms being a great coach I was just voicing my option and his English is nothing to talk about.

Blackhawk wrote:Hey thats all I was doing when he was cutting me down about Simms being a great coach I was just voicing my option and his English is nothing to talk about.

There's a difference between giving an opinion on basketball and being a jerk with an agenda against a man who's obviously doing a great job coaching. You have a personal vendetta against Tom and he's proving year after year he's doing a great job. Give an opinion on the teams and the match ups and stop running down great men who are making a difference in these kids lives. Come on man!

If you read English the way you write it, I could see you having trouble understanding me.

I don't even live there anymore. And I'm sure coaches have time to update a message board during the games. A regular Sherlock Holmes you are.

I tried to fix the page. I'm telling people now stop with the personal attacks on players, coaches , and other people on here. Stick to basketball. Like I said Tom Simms is a good coach and an even better man. Keep on topic

Hiland upset 41-40 by Lake Ridge (17-8). Hiland went 1-23 from 3.

Wow

EasternDspy wrote:11-6 after 1. Cadets missing a ton of close 3s. Played pretty tough defense. Enoch did get foul #1 in first.

What is a "close 3"?

That was a very dangerous team that got eliminated. Very good news.

thebarlowbandit wrote:

EasternDspy wrote:11-6 after 1. Cadets missing a ton of close 3s. Played pretty tough defense. Enoch did get foul #1 in first.

What is a "close 3"?

A ton of outside shots that went in and out.

Thanks, not quite sure I agree that's a "close" 3, it's a missed shot, but not sure how "close it is.