Southeastern Ohio Sports Message Board
https://southeasternohiopreps.com/
So Huntington St.Joe ain't that bad after all. To beat Fairland by 20Hoop Wizard wrote:Fairland had a Wed night game at Huntington St Joe and lost by around 20-check the Herald Dispatch.
Feel free to keep track of 71 teams records and put out your own list and don't click on Floyd's thread. It gets 100's of responses and thousands of views a week. Won't miss yours a bit.asb wrote:Yea by 17 and 24 points and East is like 29th...that's laughable for real but it's just an opinion. Peebles is ranked higher that Eastern and they lost to Eastern at home. I use to look forward to this topic, oh my
Winning at HSJ cracker box gym is tough for any team! But yes- HSJ is a quality team that can compete. Nice team with athletes and a big to clog middle.asb wrote:So Huntington St.Joe ain't that bad after all. To beat Fairland by 20Hoop Wizard wrote:Fairland had a Wed night game at Huntington St Joe and lost by around 20-check the Herald Dispatch.
that does suck..... i've got AT&T so i have no cell service. my phone tells me i have wifi. but i cant get on anything.Smeltzy wrote:Hey pfloyd.......with your PULL at Logan, do you think you could get them to either turn off their cell blocker or get some coverage inside that dang gym?
asb wrote:What reason is Porstmouth ND at #20
pfloyd wrote:asb wrote:What reason is Porstmouth ND at #20
1. Unioto (20-0)
2. Lucasville Valley (17-2)
3. Fairland (15-4)
4. Washington CH (15-4)
5. Fairfield Union (16-4)
6. Logan (12-9)
7. Vinton County (15-4)
8. Logan Elm (14-5) / Warren (16-4)
Portsmouth (11-7)
Chesapeake (15-5)
Chillicothe (10-10)
Lynchburg Clay (17-2)
Miami Trace (12-7)
Trimble (16-3)
Wheelersburg (14-3)
Meigs (16-3)
Alexander (16-5)
Peebles (15-5)
Westfall (12-7)
Here are 20 reason imo ... where do you propose ND fits into this group ? ... I have seen 18 of these 20 teams play, some multiple times - I feel good about these rankings based on records/strength of schedule/ timing of wins & loses etc. ...
I think ASB is saying they are ranked too high that there are better teams below them
... one of the reasons why - is that I DO NOT have the 2nd matchup with Portsmouth East on the Big Board ! apparently one of the scores that did not make it to my napkin stat sheets for game results ... I don't have the score on either ND's results or East's results ... THAT would drop the Titans DOWN the list BELOW the Tartans ... it will be corrected in this weeks rankings ... sure wish each of the leagues would have "a person" who would post results of ALL of the games in their representative leagues LOL ... I just looked at the OHSAA schedules - it had THE missing game between ND & East ... ND would have lost 2 games in a row in the middle of January one to Portsmouth East and Eastern Pike ... my apologizes to the East fans & TEAM !Mailman wrote:I think "asb" wants to know why they are so much higher than East when East has blown them out twice
Agreed! 4 losses, 2 to East the #1 seed and 1 to Eastern the #2 seed. And the other was to a MUCH bigger Greenup Co. That Northwest Sectional is a beast!brown22 wrote:not taking anything away from ND they are a good team #3 seed in the northwest sectional right behind east and eastern pike
I understand all those teams being ranked ahead of them...I just felt like ND shouldn't be ranked as high as they were...especially above a team that has beaten them twicepfloyd wrote:asb wrote:What reason is Porstmouth ND at #20
1. Unioto (20-0)
2. Lucasville Valley (17-2)
3. Fairland (15-4)
4. Washington CH (15-4)
5. Fairfield Union (16-4)
6. Logan (12-9)
7. Vinton County (15-4)
8. Logan Elm (14-5) / Warren (16-4)
Portsmouth (11-7)
Chesapeake (15-5)
Chillicothe (10-10)
Lynchburg Clay (17-2)
Miami Trace (12-7)
Trimble (16-3)
Wheelersburg (14-3)
Meigs (16-3)
Alexander (16-5)
Peebles (15-5)
Westfall (12-7)
Here are 20 reason imo ... where do you propose ND fits into this group ? ... I have seen 18 of these 20 teams play, some multiple times - I feel good about these rankings based on records/strength of schedule/ timing of wins & loses etc. ...
And I'm just giving my opinion like everyone else...I appreciate him taking time out to cover the areas teams..I just was questioning a few spots I saw. You can relax now it's ok...smurray wrote:I agree Crab, we can all argue about our team being too low but come on, it's ONE MAN's opinion and if you don't like it take the time to travel to see as many teams as you can, compile information on ALL these teams and do your own rankings.
Agreed!danicalifornia wrote:More discussion is better for everyone!