Standings through 1/2

[dpatty]

Let me know of any corrections.

[93Bulldog]

Federal Hocking should be above Belpre.

You list teams with loss records being the more important factor.

Even if a team is (6-2) in league play, you'd rank the team with a (1-1) record higher.

[Ironman92]

Good work on the league standings

[Ironman92]

Federal Hocking should be above Belpre.

You list teams with loss records being the more important factor.

Even if a team is (6-2) in league play, you'd rank the team with a (1-1) record higher.

So Gallia 2nd in OVC

[dpatty]

Federal Hocking should be above Belpre.

You list teams with loss records being the more important factor.

Even if a team is (6-2) in league play, you'd rank the team with a (1-1) record higher.

Its a lack of proofreading lol. I had Belpre at 1-0 and the combined conference wins and losses (12-12 works, 12-11 does not, for example) didnt add up so I double checked and I was missing Belpre’s loss. Changed that, just didnt update the places. Even have Waterford below Fed Hock. Haha. Thanks for pointing that out. I will update soon.

[93Bulldog]

Federal Hocking should be above Belpre.

You list teams with loss records being the more important factor.

Even if a team is (6-2) in league play, you'd rank the team with a (1-1) record higher.

So Gallia 2nd in OVC

That is correct.

[pfloyd]

Good Stuff !!!

[The Ghost of Swanker]

SOC2 isn’t correct and I don’t know everyone’s record but West beat Minford and Valley.