Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

little doggy
Freshman Team
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:02 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by little doggy »

only thing that will happen is they will flip their schedule , they will be in Div. 1 and play some if not all of Div. 2 in first weeks instead of last weeks, someone needs to be added to d2 because trying to find 6 non conference games is going to be rough, and will their be a floating bye week for the d2 in the last weeks or is it where each team played northwest or is the d2 conference games all moved back to the last four weeks, good for some not good for others


User avatar
ZacBrownBand
Varsity
Posts: 567
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:54 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by ZacBrownBand »

Burg_Grad_77 wrote:Northwest 2011

Southeastern (4-6) W 25-13
Sciotoville Community School (7-4) L 27-34
Huntington (0-10) W 48-21
Notre Dame (7-3) W 23-20
Symmes Valley (10-2) L 17-28
Wheelersburg (7-3) L 7-34
Minford (4-6) L 0-43
Valley (12-0) L 7-42
Portsmouth West (10-2) L 7-55
Waverly (3-7) L 20-55


Zach, if you look at Northwests schedule from this past season you see they played 3 SOCI teams and lost to 2 of them. So they may not fair all that much better in the lower tier, but I still think it's a better fit for them. At least they shouldn't go 0-5 over the last 5 weeks of the season almost every year.
Well the games certainly are closer. Definitely a better fit for NW. The games against SOC 1 teams were all pretty close games. And like you said the last 5 games, they should not be losing those. No offense to their program but they flat out outplayed by everyone those games. I think this gives them a better shot at winning.


ohiostbucks99
Freshman Team
Posts: 241
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:54 am

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by ohiostbucks99 »

i first thought this was a good move for northwest..mayb another school moving into the bigger division(ports.ironton) if it is for competition reason why isnt west being moved in basketball because there basketball is just like northwest football


kahn
Freshman Team
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:56 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by kahn »

This is a good move. I saw three schools voted against it, I can imagine it was Green, East and Notre Dame. Symmes Valley usually beats the Mohawks and since they're a bigger school, that helps in playoff points, so I guess they supported it.

I always thought it would be neat to have some kind of method wherein the SOC I winner swaps places with the SOC II last place team every year, but obviously that's not a really feasible thing with scheduling.

Anyway, hopefully this will result in the SOC II schools needing another game fitting Portsmouth into their schedules when possible. If they all end up playing the Trojans, maybe they'll let bygones be bygones and let them in the league.

Coach Fry seems to be doing a great job with Northwest and this gives them a chance to continue that momentum. Maybe when it's revisited, they can move back to the SOC II in a stronger position.


CharlieHustle
All Conference
Posts: 906
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:06 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by CharlieHustle »

I think it's a great move for the Northwest boys, you want all kids to be able to compete, no matter what school you root for....but maybe it's unfair to the much much much smaller SOC I schools. There is pro's and con's.

But now the SOC needs to allow Portsmouth in! It is so unfair that Portsmouth athletes have to travel 3 hours away just for a conference game. You cannot hold it against the Portsmouth people now, that 40 years ago they didn't want in. They would not dominate in football like many years ago...and it would create friendly in town rivalries.


User avatar
frank-n-beans
Varsity
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:07 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by frank-n-beans »

This moved has been long overdue. It might be the only way NW can build a program. Valley did it when the league first went to 2 divisions as they were a pretty pitiful program. Crabtree turned it around and then moved up to D2. When Oak Hill came in to the league their FB program was pretty bad and take away the 3 previous years, continue to be.

kahn, why would you assume Green, East and ND would vote against it? All 3 compete and usually beat NW on a consistant basis?


Jeep-ster
Freshman Team
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 12:27 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by Jeep-ster »

PHS in the SOC-2 if ONLY in football. In basketball, NW is still SOC-2 and there are 8 teams per division. Adding PHS would make one to many teams. The league is strong the way it is in basketball.


User avatar
oneoak
Varsity
Posts: 675
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:30 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by oneoak »

When Oak Hill came in to the league their FB program was pretty bad and take away the 3 previous years, continue to be.
The Oak Hill football program when they entered the league in 1992 was actually in pretty good shape although, admittedly, the schedule wasn't very challenging. The following is from the Jackson Chamber of Commerce website.

"In 1986, Oak Hill joined the Southern Valley Athletic Conference with predominantly Gallia and Meigs county schools, and also hired Jeff Conroy to be their new head coach. Instant success was found by both.

Conroy was 37-3 in his four years at Oak Hill, and won first 21 league games and three league titles. Scott Bartholomew continued the tradition and had no losing seasons in his eight years at Oak Hill and posted an all-time winning record of 52-28 as in 1992 Oak Hill moved into the Southern Ohio Conference.

From 1986 through 2001, Oak Hill had but one losing season in 16 years."

The 2-8 record in 2011 was the only losing record in the past five years. The Oaks were 33-17 over that five year span including the 2-8 record. The lean years were actually from 2002 through 2006 whcih included an 0-10 season in 2005.

I don't like being in the SOC I for football but I do like the league for the other sports both in terms of the competition and the travel. The SOC II is a very strong football league and I don't think we're ready to compete there. We and Northwest are in a difficult position for football. We are much bigger than the other SOC I schools for football but don't have any good options to go elsewhere. Also, if Oak Hill were to leave the SOC I and Northwest didn't move down there would only be four teams left in the league.


Charles Farquar
JV Team
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 12:47 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by Charles Farquar »

Siderman Oak Hill according to the Ohsaa website is 20 boys over D6 they are not big DV and certainly not DIV
Last edited by Charles Farquar on Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Slim Jim
Varsity
Posts: 470
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:15 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by Slim Jim »

Why is going to take til 2014 to go into effect?


Westfan
SEOP
Posts: 3087
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 8:16 am

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by Westfan »

Enrollment is the basis how our divisions are set in Ohio. I know this is a league, but saying "we aren't good at that sport, so we'll drop back; but we are good at that one so we'll stay there" is stupid. Oak Hill and NW should be either SOC II or out all-together. As has been said, West has been bottom dwellers in basketball for a long time, but we take our beatings and try to get better, which we are.

Schedule wise, is this a good thing for NW? They already play most of the SOC I schools. So now they have to find non-conference games, as most of their non-conference games now will be conference games. Most SOC II will drop them like a bad habit because of points. Will they be able to find games they can compete in without driving 100 miles?

Other thing is why do we have umpteen threads a year about Portsmouth and the SOC II? Do you think this is gonna save your program? With Northwest moving, playing in the SOC II will get you 2 extra games (Minford and Waverly), with you already playing West, Wheelersburg, and Valley next year. I bet if you can match the dates up, Minford will play and beat you now.


kahn
Freshman Team
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:56 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by kahn »

Frank,

Good call, on second thought, that wasn't a safe assumption, my bad. I do wonder who voted against the move.


Portsmouth98
All State
Posts: 1169
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:33 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by Portsmouth98 »

siderman wrote: Other thing is why do we have umpteen threads a year about Portsmouth and the SOC II? Do you think this is gonna save your program? With Northwest moving, playing in the SOC II will get you 2 extra games (Minford and Waverly), with you already playing West, Wheelersburg, and Valley next year. I bet if you can match the dates up, Minford will play and beat you now.
#1: At least half these threads are started by posters who support SOC schools we already play who want the games to mean more., or SEOAL schools who want us out of the league because they don't want to travel to ptown anymore.

#2: I'd rather travel 25 minutes to lose to Minford than 3 hours to lose to Logan or Warren.


FarAwayFalcon
Varsity
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:53 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by FarAwayFalcon »

siderman wrote:Enrollment is the basis how our divisions are set in Ohio. I know this is a league, but saying "we aren't good at that sport, so we'll drop back; but we are good at that one so we'll stay there" is stupid. Oak Hill and NW should be either SOC II or out all-together. As has been said, West has been bottom dwellers in basketball for a long time, but we take our beatings and try to get better, which we are.

Schedule wise, is this a good thing for NW? They already play most of the SOC I schools. So now they have to find non-conference games, as most of their non-conference games now will be conference games. Most SOC II will drop them like a bad habit because of points. Will they be able to find games they can compete in without driving 100 miles?

Other thing is why do we have umpteen threads a year about Portsmouth and the SOC II? Do you think this is gonna save your program? With Northwest moving, playing in the SOC II will get you 2 extra games (Minford and Waverly), with you already playing West, Wheelersburg, and Valley next year. I bet if you can match the dates up, Minford will play and beat you now.
I think you have some good points siderman. Is this good for NW? Yes. Is it good for the SOC I or II? I don't really think it is. Why should the conference have to make up for the shortcomings at NW? It's not 'our' fault that NW cannot field a competitive team.

My biggest beef with it is that it's not like NW has done their absolute best to compete at football over the years. The school board and other administrators out there have run off every single decent coach to give it a go. If the school system was really committed and still couldn't field a decent team I would feel different. But with the district half-doing a football program I do not feel sorry for them, the kids yes, the district, no.


User avatar
eagles73Taylor
SE
Posts: 2479
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:18 pm
Location: Piketon, Ohio

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by eagles73Taylor »

I think Northwest should look at themselves, not just what division they are in. They have had a carousel of coaches in football the last 5 years, is this the only reason, no but it doesnt help. Northwest is an anomally for this area, they are big, but only because their district covers as much square miles as it does. If you look at the population density, they are just like everyone else in the area.

First, Northwest get some solidity at coaching which I think they have. Second, if you start building your program and you still can compete in the future against the SOC II teams look at moving leagues all together. Of course this is just my opinion.


osu 77
All State
Posts: 1128
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 2:04 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by osu 77 »

Are they going to drop off everyones schedule in the SOCII?


Sider_PC
Riding the Bench
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:23 am

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by Sider_PC »

I have heard the only team they plan on keeping on the schedule is Minford.


blue53
All State
Posts: 1010
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:50 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by blue53 »

PDT quoted them as saying Valley and Minford, maybe


FarAwayFalcon
Varsity
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:53 pm

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by FarAwayFalcon »

blue53 wrote:PDT quoted them as saying Valley and Minford, maybe

If I'm Valley and Minford, I don't know how I would feel about that. Other than short bus ride there's not a good part to this game.


Westfan
SEOP
Posts: 3087
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 8:16 am

Re: Northwest switching from SOC 2 to SOC 1?

Post by Westfan »

2011 AND 2012 ENROLLMENT NUMBERS

OHSAA
ID School Name City OHSAA
District Boys Girls
Enrollment Class Enrollment Class

1166 NORTHWEST MC DERMOTT SOUTHEAST 187 AA 158 AA
1186 OAK HILL OAK HILL SOUTHEAST 160 AA 156 AA

484 SCIOTOVILLE COMMUNITY PORTSMOUTH SOUTHEAST 74 A 70 A
1178 NOTRE DAME PORTSMOUTH SOUTHEAST 37 A 48 A
668 GREEN FRANKLIN FURNACE SOUTHEAST 64 A 66 A
1514 SYMMES VALLEY WILLOW WOOD SOUTHEAST 96 A 83 A

Just look at those numbers. 187 and 160 boys competing against schools with 74, 37, 64, and 96. Tell me how this is fair to those schools? NW's new colors should be blue, red, and YELLOW.


Post Reply

Return to “Football”