Why is she not hm this year then? Did the coach go?mcooper wrote:Looking at the results in the paper, I am shocked. How Emma Wardlow, a senior, 1000 point scorer, made HM as a freshman, 3rd Team as a sophomore, and didn't make anything the last 2 years. That is a shame. One of the hardest working kids I have ever coached.
District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
Re: District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
Re: District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
I am unsure. I got out 2 seasons ago. Just know her and the family well. If any kid is deserving, it was her.
Re: District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
I heard that she received 3rd team honors but was omitted from the newspaper write up accidentally.
Re: District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
Hopefully she did, she deserves a chance to play on the district all star game. If she got 3rd team, did Carr or Harless receive HM? I would think both would have been deserving based on their numbers this season.
Re: District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
I was hoping one of them could get an honorable mention if Emma made 3rd team or better. I guess it depends on the number of spots available. Harless had a great season and was wonderfully improved. I think Carr was around 12 ppg and led team in rebounds as a point guard. (Could be wrong though)mcooper wrote:Hopefully she did, she deserves a chance to play on the district all star game. If she got 3rd team, did Carr or Harless receive HM? I would think both would have been deserving based on their numbers this season.
Re: District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
Talked with Emma and she did not receive anything. Very disheartening.
Re: District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
Unacceptable that she didn't get anything.mcooper wrote:Talked with Emma and she did not receive anything. Very disheartening.
Re: District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
Congrats to the girls who made the list. Not meaning any disrespect to anyone but how can there not be 3 Waterford girls on the first team? Stats don't really mean that much when 3 girls score 10 points in the first half and you have to stop pressing to avoid being viewed as unsportsmanlike. Our best players have had their best stat games in the big games, because we can continue to push for points. It won't matter to our Team girls because they are on a mission, but every year we hear about how good this girl is or that girl..and when we finally meet up they get owned just like last night. Put any of our players on any of the other teams around and they would be stat machines. It's a crock.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2015 7:57 am
Re: District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
Proves the point of the start of this thread. AP does not have the politics of the "coach voting".Ironman92 wrote:She got second team all-district per AP.
Re: District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
gobucksBlitz wrote:Proves the point of the start of this thread. AP does not have the politics of the "coach voting".Ironman92 wrote:She got second team all-district per AP.
AP also has more spots on each team and is not dependent on a coach or school paying their coaching dues in order to nominate and vote on players
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2015 7:57 am
Re: District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
Good points. But I hope you do see in the list, that players that were voted higher and ahead of other players on the coaches were not voted as high/or ahead on the AP and not ahead of the players in the coaches. Just a point.80sballer wrote:gobucksBlitz wrote:Proves the point of the start of this thread. AP does not have the politics of the "coach voting".Ironman92 wrote:She got second team all-district per AP.
AP also has more spots on each team and is not dependent on a coach or school paying their coaching dues in order to nominate and vote on players
Re: District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
I would think your points would have more to do with the fact that there are more teams involved in the AP compared to the coaches. In div 4 for AP you have Waterford, Eastern Meigs, southern, Ironton st joe etc. who are not involved in the coaches team that you are talking about.gobucksBlitz wrote:Good points. But I hope you do see in the list, that players that were voted higher and ahead of other players on the coaches were not voted as high/or ahead on the AP and not ahead of the players in the coaches. Just a point.80sballer wrote:gobucksBlitz wrote: Proves the point of the start of this thread. AP does not have the politics of the "coach voting".
AP also has more spots on each team and is not dependent on a coach or school paying their coaching dues in order to nominate and vote on players
Re: District 14 voting- 2/14/2016
Coaches have 2 districts within the SE do t they (13 and 14)....AP is entire district.80sballer wrote:I would think your points would have more to do with the fact that there are more teams involved in the AP compared to the coaches. In div 4 for AP you have Waterford, Eastern Meigs, southern, Ironton st joe etc. who are not involved in the coaches team that you are talking about.gobucksBlitz wrote:Good points. But I hope you do see in the list, that players that were voted higher and ahead of other players on the coaches were not voted as high/or ahead on the AP and not ahead of the players in the coaches. Just a point.80sballer wrote:
AP also has more spots on each team and is not dependent on a coach or school paying their coaching dues in order to nominate and vote on players
Regardless, definitely way less politics with AP