WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post Reply
dilligaf
S
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:06 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by dilligaf »

Happy McGavin wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 2:47 pm
tomcat82 wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 2:07 pm
Ed Turdwhittler wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:28 pm

they would have still been d6 if they didnt get a handful of kids fom fed hock. In a way they re the reason fed lost their program.
They came from Morgan .....................nice try...
They've been at Trimble their whole lives so I wouldn't even say they came from Morgan
Yeah there was no new players same players since little league.


OSU22
Varsity
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 11:09 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by OSU22 »

[/quote]

Yeah there was no new players same players since little league.
[/quote]

That basically backs up the point that Trimble would've been D6 even without competitive balance. They were just bigger this year than other schools. I'm sure they'll drop back down soon. Is it every year or every other year they redo the regions? I can never remember


Green 50
Riding the Bench
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 3:28 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Green 50 »

OSU22 wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:25 pm
Yeah there was no new players same players since little league.
[/quote]

That basically backs up the point that Trimble would've been D6 even without competitive balance. They were just bigger this year than other schools. I'm sure they'll drop back down soon. Is it every year or every other year they redo the regions? I can never remember
[/quote]
Trimble needs to give Newark catholic a call to find out how to lower your numbers to get back down to d7 :D


dilligaf
S
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:06 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by dilligaf »

OSU22 wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:25 pm
Yeah there was no new players same players since little league.
[/quote]

That basically backs up the point that Trimble would've been D6 even without competitive balance. They were just bigger this year than other schools. I'm sure they'll drop back down soon. Is it every year or every other year they redo the regions? I can never remember
[

No it doent back up anything Trimble same size as always d-7 just this here they got hit with the c.b rule That rule was made up for inter city schools who have kids all over to recruit Trimble never recruited anyone but i guess its a waste of time trying to explain it on here some people just cant or dont want to understand what happened.


dilligaf
S
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:06 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by dilligaf »

Every kid in bishopville goes to Trimble its a 20 mile drive to morgan 3 minute drive to Glouster school. Trimble few kids that put them in c.b. wil be gone this year.


icanpickem
All Conference
Posts: 981
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:24 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by icanpickem »

dilligaf wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:31 pm Every kid in bishopville goes to Trimble its a 20 mile drive to morgan 3 minute drive to Glouster school. Trimble few kids that put them in c.b. wil be gone this year.
CB rosters /numbers run a year behind. The kids on this year's team are being entered now to count for next year's cb number.

https://ohsaa.org/School-Resources/Comp ... rce-Center


Tigerfan
Riding the Bench
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2017 7:00 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Tigerfan »

This argument is so stupid.... Eliminate competitive balance and Trimble is still DVI.
You are bigger than Mogadore and I don't hear them complaining


dilligaf
S
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:06 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by dilligaf »

No one complaining just trying to explain to some on here why they are d-6 havent heard anyone complain about it all year.I do wish we could have knocked you guys out of the playoffs again :mrgreen:


OSU22
Varsity
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 11:09 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by OSU22 »

dilligaf wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:29 pm
OSU22 wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:25 pm
Yeah there was no new players same players since little league.
That basically backs up the point that Trimble would've been D6 even without competitive balance. They were just bigger this year than other schools. I'm sure they'll drop back down soon. Is it every year or every other year they redo the regions? I can never remember
[

No it doent back up anything Trimble same size as always d-7 just this here they got hit with the c.b rule That rule was made up for inter city schools who have kids all over to recruit Trimble never recruited anyone but i guess its a waste of time trying to explain it on here some people just cant or dont want to understand what happened.
[/quote]


I'm not saying they were bigger this year than in years past, you're correct they're the same size. But other schools that were bigger are now smaller than them. Trimble would have been D6 This year even without competitive Balance.


Orange and Brown
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 20590
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Next to a lake somewhere
Contact:

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Orange and Brown »

Learn how to quote each other people 😂


Championship's are won in the off-season
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
Shotgun red
Riding the Bench
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:01 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Shotgun red »

Orange and Brown wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 9:08 am Learn how to quote each other people 😂
Move on buddy, this game is over!


I am not a Burrows fan but, I am a BURROW fan!
dilligaf
S
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:06 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by dilligaf »

See you guys next football season.


User avatar
Ground Buck
All Conference
Posts: 986
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 8:18 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Ground Buck »

dilligaf wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 1:20 pm
Ground Buck wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 11:08 am
Raider6309 wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:54 pm Paladin is getting old, ground chuck might have to be the new Paladin
WOW! What a compliment. To Paladine that is. :mrgreen:

But really, these jokers on here stoned me when I said the wee cats would struggle to pass against a good team. Then, after two picks in the end zone cost them the game, they try to change the subject. Just pointing out that I knew what I was talking about. But hey, the bright side is in a year or two looks like they'll be back in D7 where they can run the wishbone with ineligible T's instead of TE's as their EMOLOS all the way to the state finals. :mrgreen:
Finally came out of the hole i see ground suck you seem to be forgetting about the first play off game. Where was you and your stupidity then.
Are you referring to the couple of prayers they threw up and were lucky to have a receiver in the vicinity? :mrgreen:


Disclaimer: This is all an opinion and I am therefore hoping we can still express opinions on this site without retort.
User avatar
Ground Buck
All Conference
Posts: 986
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 8:18 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Ground Buck »

dilligaf wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:53 am See you guys next football season.
Yep, roll out the balls. :mrgreen:


Disclaimer: This is all an opinion and I am therefore hoping we can still express opinions on this site without retort.
Pol pot
SE
Posts: 2084
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:11 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Pol pot »

icanpickem wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:49 pm
dilligaf wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:31 pm Every kid in bishopville goes to Trimble its a 20 mile drive to morgan 3 minute drive to Glouster school. Trimble few kids that put them in c.b. wil be gone this year.
CB rosters /numbers run a year behind. The kids on this year's team are being entered now to count for next year's cb number.

https://ohsaa.org/School-Resources/Comp ... rce-Center
Actually NO, it’s the EMIS number that goes off of the last years count, the CB number is fluid and that is why Regions are redrawn every year. Before CB the counts were always 2 year cycles, now schools can change every year.


icanpickem
All Conference
Posts: 981
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:24 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by icanpickem »

Pol pot wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2019 2:59 am
icanpickem wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:49 pm
dilligaf wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:31 pm Every kid in bishopville goes to Trimble its a 20 mile drive to morgan 3 minute drive to Glouster school. Trimble few kids that put them in c.b. wil be gone this year.
CB rosters /numbers run a year behind. The kids on this year's team are being entered now to count for next year's cb number.

https://ohsaa.org/School-Resources/Comp ... rce-Center
Actually NO, it’s the EMIS number that goes off of the last years count, the CB number is fluid and that is why Regions are redrawn every year. Before CB the counts were always 2 year cycles, now schools can change every year.
Tell me how the CB number from this year's fall sports are factored in to the current count when ad's still have a couple of weeks to enter the current fall sports roster into the portal. They run a season behind.


User avatar
Raider6309
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 12909
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
Location: Athens

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Raider6309 »

Springfield is up 28-14 in the third


Happy McGavin
Varsity
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:41 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Happy McGavin »

Watching Springfield score at will on Mogadore is crazy. Could of, would of, should of for the Tomcats.


Its all in the hips
User avatar
Raider6309
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 12909
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
Location: Athens

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Raider6309 »

The only problem is Anna is the best team D5-D7. They are a buzz saw


Happy McGavin
Varsity
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:41 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Happy McGavin »

Raider6309 wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:12 pm The only problem is Anna is the best team D5-D7. They are a buzz saw
You ain't wrong there


Its all in the hips
Post Reply

Return to “Football”