Page 1 of 4

Waterford 22 Trimble 0

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 8:23 am
by Ttomcat99
Rematch from earlier in the year. If we dont make the mistakes as last time and keep the offense we have now but maybe mix it up a little we have a shot. What's everyone else think

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 8:25 am
by Orange and Brown
I think this will be a good game and everyone will get their money's worth!

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 9:09 am
by 93Bulldog
Please be at athens, please be at athens, please be at athens ... lol

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 9:23 am
by Ttomcat99
93Bulldog wrote:Please be at athens, please be at athens, please be at athens ... lol

My guess they will say its to close for us. I would love for it to be athens but id say Maysville

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 11:11 am
by H-back
My guess is one of the zanesville fields

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 12:20 pm
by 93Bulldog
My money is on Z anesville high school.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 12:40 pm
by EasternDspy
I heard Sheridan???

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 12:41 pm
by seasick80
Logan?

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 12:43 pm
by 93Bulldog
At Philo! Official

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 3:18 pm
by Lovebball42
Who wins?

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 4:10 pm
by Stan_Marsh
Trimble gets it this time!

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 4:23 pm
by Sports24/7
If this Trimble team had more discipline & senior leadership...would go with them in a heartbeat but....they don't....so....Waterford moves on....

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 7:19 pm
by H-back
Only points Waterford gave up vs rosecrans was on terrible mistakes. First touchdown Waterford had them stopped at the 50 and jumped offside. Then a play or two later, Rosecrans ran a play to the sideline and got 15 yards tacked on for a late hit out of bounds putting it inside the twenty and Johnston got in from there. On the safety was just a bad snap over punters head. Waterford defense was good all night except for one or two drives. If Trimble cannot succeed in passing the ball, howie will be getting the boys ready for basketball

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 8:25 pm
by tomcat fan
In the first matchup Trimble hadn't established the power running game yet(wishbone), now that they have, if it's effective I see Trimble winning the rematch. Waterford got a few scores on busted coverage in the first matchup. I'd expect with film and practice that will be cleaned up this go around. Good luck and Go Tomcats

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 9:15 pm
by H2O4RD
That wasn't blown coverage, that dude got toasted.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 9:40 pm
by noreply66
hard to beat Trimble once and even harder twice

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 7:39 am
by Someonebetter
H2O4RD wrote:That wasn't blown coverage, that dude got toasted.


Waterford kid was running down middle of field with no one around him for 20 yards. I doubt the kid is so good that he could blow past a defender like that. Its called blown coverage.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 7:48 am
by Stone Cold
If Trimble runs the wishbone on every snap, I do not think they will win. Waterford's front 7 is as good as I have seen in this area. They have to throw the ball to win.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 8:32 am
by route7
Gimme the TOMS 21-14 over the WILDS

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 8:40 am
by HoopsHotHead
TVC advances in this one!!

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:32 am
by H2O4RD
Nope. Dude got smoked.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:52 am
by H2O4RD
Trimble probably wouldn't have scored at all without the bogus pass interference penalties in the end zone. Both were perfectly defended, defender making a play on the ball. Hopefully we only have to play against 11 this week.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 11:41 am
by tomcat fan
H2O4RD wrote:Trimble probably wouldn't have scored at all without the bogus pass interference penalties in the end zone. Both were perfectly defended, defender making a play on the ball. Hopefully we only have to play against 11 this week.

There was blown coverage twice, and Trimble fumbled on their own 10 giving Waterford 3 scores basically. Congrats tho, good teams capitalize on mistakes and Waterford has a very good team, but your statement about playing against only 11 this week sounds like you're making excuses already if you happen to lose.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 1:05 pm
by Raider6309
Trimble wins the rematch

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 1:11 pm
by Dirty Sanchez
H2O4RD wrote:Trimble probably wouldn't have scored at all without the bogus pass interference penalties in the end zone. Both were perfectly defended, defender making a play on the ball. Hopefully we only have to play against 11 this week.


Hilarious it is to have someone, ANYONE, from Waterford insinuating that officials at other schools cheat. Flat out hilarious. No matter the officials, Trimble will have to improve greatly on their game plan from the first game against Waterford. If not, the results will be the same.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 1:13 pm
by Orange and Brown
I think this game will go one of 2 ways.
It will either come down to the last possession or it will be a 30 point win.
Gotta pull for Trimble and I do hope they win but I won't be shocked if Waterford does.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 3:11 pm
by H2O4RD
When your corner is playing man coverage and the receiver runs a go route and the corner gets smoked and trails the receiver all the way to the endzone, thats not blown coverage. You could call it bad coverage, and I might agree. Or you could call it putting the kid in a bad position to defend. Playing man coverage because you cant stop the run is sometimes a necessary risk. Playing with fire will get you burned sometimes.

The second TD pass, against man, was thrown to the back who went in motion. Assuming that was the sam linebackers man, who was on a blitz, again not blown coverage. Qb made a good read and found the uncovered receiver. Actually it was probably man with a safety over the top now that i think about it.

Blown coverage is when a safety bites on a curl, and they throw it over him, corner plays flat when he has deep etc. That wasn't what happened here.

Doesn't really matter other than saying blown coverage somehow cheapens the touchdown, like it was a fluke and wasnt earned. Like it was given to us.

I expect to see a better team this time around, and you should too.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 4:16 pm
by ttomcat 80
First off the 1st TD defender fell down.The 2nd TD they lined up in twins did a crossing route and the defender didn't not pick him up he was so open QB probley was afraid he might over throw him, so I would say bad coverage not getting burned.Believe what you want to but that's what a lot of other people seen to.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:22 pm
by NY BUCKS
Like to see trimble get the win. .

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 12:20 am
by greygoose
Well round 2 of the playoffs and round 2 for these teams. Waterford really struggled in round 1 with #8 seed. Think this should be a really good game both teams will have learned and grown since last meeting. Going to take Waterford by a score in a low scoring affair.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 3:46 am
by EasternDspy
greygoose wrote:Well round 2 of the playoffs and round 2 for these teams. Waterford really struggled in round 1 with #8 seed. Think this should be a really good game both teams will have learned and grown since last meeting. Going to take Waterford by a score in a low scoring affair.



Rosecrans was a good team they were better then Southern.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 8:20 am
by TVC
EasternDspy wrote:
greygoose wrote:Well round 2 of the playoffs and round 2 for these teams. Waterford really struggled in round 1 with #8 seed. Think this should be a really good game both teams will have learned and grown since last meeting. Going to take Waterford by a score in a low scoring affair.



Rosecrans was a good team they were better then Southern.


Southern should have been up 14-7 at halftime. A fumble on the 9 and a phantom false start flag on the 1 that was thrown after Southern scored cost them a chance at winning. Trimble is in a down year for their standards therefore I look for a Waterford win by 20 this week.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:27 am
by Jim Ryan
TVC wrote:
EasternDspy wrote:
greygoose wrote:Well round 2 of the playoffs and round 2 for these teams. Waterford really struggled in round 1 with #8 seed. Think this should be a really good game both teams will have learned and grown since last meeting. Going to take Waterford by a score in a low scoring affair.



Rosecrans was a good team they were better then Southern.


Southern should have been up 14-7 at halftime. A fumble on the 9 and a phantom false start flag on the 1 that was thrown after Southern scored cost them a chance at winning. Trimble is in a down year for their standards therefore I look for a Waterford win by 20 this week.


I'm glad someone posted this, so I didn't have to be the one to say it. But yes, the officials had several suspect calls that killed Southern. The officials killed Southern when they played at Waterford too. We expected that, cause that is Waterford's M.O. But who would expect it to happen in a playoff game? Trimble is not very good right now, so I say Waterford is the better team. Timbles pass defense is horrid. They double covered Southern's best receiver all night with the same two players and they were never able to stop him, or make a play on the ball. So if the officials are neutral and Waterford can pass the ball they should win, but with the way these two coaches seem to be able to get the calls who knows?

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:47 am
by Orange and Brown
Apparently, the officials just handed the game to Trimble and they didn't actually do anything to win the game :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Come on people, Trimble was better than Southern that night.
If Trimble is not that good, what does that say about Southern?? They did beat Southern twice this season.

Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:47 am
by Orange and Brown
Good luck this Basketball season Tornados!