Portsmouth 40 South Point 20

mattash
Site Admin
Posts: 1456
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2015 9:35 pm

Portsmouth 40 South Point 20

Postby mattash » Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:03 pm

South Point is improving and could get an upset here.



bbn77
Posts: 793
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:24 am
Location: Chesapeake

Re: WK9 Portsmouth (5-3) @ South Point (0-8)

Postby bbn77 » Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:08 pm

After watching South Point last night, it won't be close. The Pointers still have a long way to go. And after seeing the South Point crowd and Portsmouth's reputation of being fair weathered fans, this could very well have less than 500 in attendance
ROLL PEAKE

X8XOHIOLEGENDX7X
Posts: 748
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:21 pm
Location: wellston
Contact:

Re: WK9 Portsmouth (5-3) @ South Point (0-8)

Postby X8XOHIOLEGENDX7X » Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:06 am

35-7 ptown
GO BUCKEYES ROCKETS AND BENGALS.....

trojandave
Posts: 323
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 6:17 pm
Location: Portsmouth HS--15 State Appearances in Boys Basketball--3rd All Time in Ohio

Re: WK9 Portsmouth (5-3) @ South Point (0-8)

Postby trojandave » Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:24 am

A win by PHS will give the Trojans their first winning season since 2010. The Portsmouth defense has given up 134 points the last 3 games. Regardless of South Point's record, that has to improve for PHS to get that 6th win.

GO TROJANS!!!

PTrojan59
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:56 pm
Location: Portsmouth

Re: WK9 Portsmouth (5-3) @ South Point (0-8)

Postby PTrojan59 » Tue Oct 18, 2016 11:19 pm

No reason why the Trojans don't pick up win number 6 of the year Friday night. Sadly don't think I'll be able to make it. Go Trojans!
Who Dey!

User avatar
YOU'RE TIGER BAIT
Posts: 4940
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2015 9:51 am
Location: WAVERLY, OHIO

Re: WK9 Portsmouth (5-3) @ South Point (0-8)

Postby YOU'RE TIGER BAIT » Wed Oct 19, 2016 9:30 am

gotta go with the Trojans here.
IN THE LONG GRASS BY THE WATER, SO WATCH YOUR STEP. AND LET'S GO IRONTON FIGHTING TIGERS, OHIO STATE BUCKEYES AND THE CINCINNATI BENGALS

wobycat
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 1:35 pm

Re: Portsmouth 40 South Point 20

Postby wobycat » Sat Oct 22, 2016 5:23 pm

Trojans are a Parker away from being 0-9.

PTrojan59
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:56 pm
Location: Portsmouth

Re: Portsmouth 40 South Point 20

Postby PTrojan59 » Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:52 pm

wobycat wrote:Trojans are a Parker away from being 0-9.


What a stupid comment, not taking anything away from Parker he's outstanding especially for a freshman...but if any player were to be taken off this team and it hurt the most it would be Purdy...wouldn't be 0-9 without either btw
Who Dey!

Gobucks740
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 1:03 pm

Re: Portsmouth 40 South Point 20

Postby Gobucks740 » Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:56 pm

PTrojan59 wrote:
wobycat wrote:Trojans are a Parker away from being 0-9.


What a stupid comment, not taking anything away from Parker he's outstanding especially for a freshman...but if any player were to be taken off this team and it hurt the most it would be Purdy...wouldn't be 0-9 without either btw



I agree 100%. Not much knowledge coming from that comment

wobycat
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 1:35 pm

Re: Portsmouth 40 South Point 20

Postby wobycat » Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:56 pm

It's my opinion whether you think it's stupid or not. The line doesn't block, defense isn't that good.

wobycat
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 1:35 pm

Re: Portsmouth 40 South Point 20

Postby wobycat » Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:59 pm

I'll give you valley and gallia academy but that's only because they aren't very good.

Gobucks740
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 1:03 pm

Re: Portsmouth 40 South Point 20

Postby Gobucks740 » Sat Oct 22, 2016 11:54 pm

wobycat wrote:I'll give you valley and gallia academy but that's only because they aren't very good.


The games against west and rock hill would've been won without talyn as well considering they both shut him down so even to say 2-7 is pretty ignorant

wobycat
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 1:35 pm

Re: Portsmouth 40 South Point 20

Postby wobycat » Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:01 pm

Nope. I stand by my assessment. Teams focus on Parker which allows other things to open up. Remove that threat and everything changes.


Return to “Football”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 51 guests