Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post Reply
J8fusl
Freshman Team
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:29 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by J8fusl »

Where are all the Waterford fans? Predicting wins and 30 points? Bbtrucking must be sucking his thumb right now.


Chaw
Freshman Team
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 6:44 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by Chaw »

Oh we're still here....we just don't have to assure ourselves that we are good by beating a school that is three times smaller than ourselves....btw ...how many div. 6 and div. 5 teams do you play ...and win?...FF plays mostly div.7 teams.... celebrate with pride blue....All in all it was a great game and one turnover or one play could've changed it all...there was no domination...just good hard football... always is...


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18322
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

Chaw wrote: Sun Sep 10, 2017 11:15 am Oh we're still here....we just don't have to assure ourselves that we are good by beating a school that is three times smaller than ourselves....btw ...how many div. 6 and div. 5 teams do you play ...and win?...FF plays mostly div.7 teams.... celebrate with pride blue....All in all it was a great game and one turnover or one play could've changed it all...there was no domination...just good hard football... always is...
What? Fort Frye is D6 and Waterford is D7. Fort Frye is playing Warren this week and they are D3. 3 times smaller it's like 40 kids both of these schools are considered small. Funny when Waterford was winning you never heard the " Poor us Fort Frye is so much bigger then us. Get real Fort only has like 35 players.


efarns
S
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:29 am

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by efarns »

This is true. The series has been a total mismatch. We should drop Waterford and play Morgan or someone who has a chance to win sometimes.


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18322
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

I hope the game is always played! I think everyone in the community was there Friday! I love this game. I do get super tired of Waterford using school size as a crutch. Come on the news paper claims Waterford has 38 players to Fort Fryes 34. School size has nothing to do with the game.


User avatar
LICKING COUNTY FAN
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 45515
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:05 am
Location: Buckeye Lake, Ohio
Contact:

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by LICKING COUNTY FAN »

Sounds like a game every fan had to enjoy.

Congrats on another huge win in this rival game.


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18322
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

Chaw wrote: Sun Sep 10, 2017 11:15 am Oh we're still here....we just don't have to assure ourselves that we are good by beating a school that is three times smaller than ourselves....btw ...how many div. 6 and div. 5 teams do you play ...and win?...FF plays mostly div.7 teams.... celebrate with pride blue....All in all it was a great game and one turnover or one play could've changed it all...there was no domination...just good hard football... always is...
Fort Frye Schedule Breakdown
4 D7
4 D6
1 D5
1 D3


That is a perfectly acceptable schedule for a D6 school. Must be good enough considering the point system is heavily based on strength of schedule and they've finished 1st and 2md last 2 years.


efarns
S
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:29 am

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by efarns »

No. Chaw is right. Look at the all time record on this series. Fort Frye should find someone in an upper division for week 3. Isn't Williamstown about the same size? If Marietta is going to trounce them by 40, maybe they'd want to play Fort Frye in week 3.


Jughead
Waterboy
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 8:22 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by Jughead »

Maybe you can schedule Newark catholic


efarns
S
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:29 am

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by efarns »

That's great! Welcome to the forums Jughead!


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18322
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

Jughead wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2017 6:29 am Maybe you can schedule Newark catholic
They do have a matchup with a very good Steubenville Catholic week 10.


Billybob55
JV Team
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by Billybob55 »

I think both schools have the toughest non conference schedules possible for them. Waterford only gets 2 non conference games so it's tough to argue the strength of their schedule because they have to play 5 games a year against teams who can't compete with them


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18322
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

Fort Frye plays
D6 Belpre
D6 Barnesville
D7 Waterford
D5 Northridge
D6 Steubenville Central Cath
D3 Warren


I think it is a huge upgrade from Wirt and Newcomerstown the last 2 seasons.


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18322
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

PVC has shrunk so much I can't believe the Monroe Central is D7 now. 3 of the 4 D7 teams Fort play are PVC opponents.


Billybob55
JV Team
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by Billybob55 »

Tvc hocking needs to shrink. Only issue is the teams that would get booted are the better teams


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18322
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

Billybob55 wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:03 pm Tvc hocking needs to shrink. Only issue is the teams that would get booted are the better teams
New league
Fort Frye
Belpre
Trimble
Nelsonville York
Waterford
Wahama


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18322
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

EasternDspy wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:07 pm
Billybob55 wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:03 pm Tvc hocking needs to shrink. Only issue is the teams that would get booted are the better teams
New league
Fort Frye
Belpre
Trimble
Nelsonville York
Waterford
Wahama

Southern
Eastern

Are welcomed if they think they can keep up.


enigmaax
All State
Posts: 1113
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:18 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by enigmaax »

Billybob55 wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:03 pm Tvc hocking needs to shrink. Only issue is the teams that would get booted are the better teams
No it doesn't. It is the perfect small school league; virtually guaranteed 3 playoff teams per year and have been within a ball bounce of getting four teams in. Trimble, Waterford, & Wahama have had their best ever playoff runs in the last half decade and at least six of the nine teams have made the playoffs.

The ability to compete with each other has raised the standard at schools who struggled for decades. It is exactly the right situation for all of those schools.


Chaw
Freshman Team
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 6:44 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by Chaw »

The divisions are based on number of male students enrolled not how many players they have.

DIV. VII DIV. VI
0-99 100-150


Belpre. 102 ( barely div. VI)

Waterford. 73. (Below average of div VII)

Shenandoah. 103 ( barely VI)

River. 108 (another barely)

Warren. (Div.III .....but c'mon.. it's Warren)

Fort Frye. 143 (7 from div. V)

Northridge. Div. VI. Fort lost

Shenandoah will probably trounce the fort by 2 tds

The rest are Div. VII

Belpre and Shenandoah both were div. VII last year. So a practically div. V team beats mostly div. VII teams every year. PLAY SOMEBODY...


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18322
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

Chaw wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:36 pm The divisions are based on number of male students enrolled not how many players they have.

DIV. VII DIV. VI
0-99 100-150


Belpre. 102 ( barely div. VI)

Waterford. 73. (Below average of div VII)

Shenandoah. 103 ( barely VI)

River. 108 (another barely)

Warren. (Div.III .....but c'mon.. it's Warren)

Fort Frye. 143 (7 from div. V)

Northridge. Div. VI. Fort lost

Shenandoah will probably trounce the fort by 2 tds

The rest are Div. VII

Belpre and Shenandoah both were div. VII last year. So a practically div. V team beats mostly div. VII teams every year. PLAY SOMEBODY...

Waterford has more players that's a terrible excuse.


Post Reply

Return to “Football”